Conservative MP Karl McCartney claimed £20,000 in expenses for work done by campaign donors firm

These services were offered at ₤ 200 a day plus VAT. In January 2020, McCartney declared for ₤ 7,200 towards them. In February and March he declared an additional ₤ 4,800 monthly. In June 2020, McCartney declared for another ₤ 4,800. ” Handled correctly, all will share in new wealth”

EXCLUSIVE: Conservative MP Karl McCartney claimed ₤ 21,600 of parliamentary costs for services from a firm established by a project donor
Anagallis Communications founder provided McCartney ₤ 4,000 towards his very first effective election campaign.
Advocates TaxPayers Alliance told Insider: “MPs must not be paying for professional services from firms that have actually made political donations to their election campaigns.
See more stories on Insiders organization page.

Conservative Member of Parliament Karl McCartney granted more than ₤ 20,000 of taxpayer money to a company run by a donor who helped money his first election campaign, an examination by Insider has found.Examination of the MP for Lincolns costs returns exposes that from January to June of 2020, McCartney claimed for ₤ 21,600 of “administrative services” from Anagallis Communications. The sole director, shareholder, and CEO of Anagallis Communications, Nigel Szembel, offered McCartney ₤ 4,000 in early 2010, prior to his effective project to oust his Labour Party predecessor, Gillian Meron.Invoices disclosed through a Freedom of Information request reveal Anagallis provided “administrative workplace and external conference support services, top-level meeting participation, strategy solution and participation in London and Lincoln and daily Media Management. Administration of different requirements to support the Member of Parliament in protecting effective results for regional problems and tasks and constituency casework issues.”

The superyacht, Elandess is seen moored at HMS President on the River Thames on July 05, 2018 after making its first voyage to London

Getty

Szembel is also lead of press relations at Augmentum, a fintech firm.” Handled properly, all will share in new wealth”, he stated in his tweet.This piece consisted of an area on three endeavor capital companies in the fintech world, consisting of Augmentum.

The sole director, investor, and CEO of Anagallis Communications, Nigel Szembel, gave McCartney ₤ 4,000 in early 2010, prior to his successful campaign to oust his Labour Party predecessor, Gillian Meron.Invoices revealed through a Freedom of Information request expose Anagallis supplied “administrative workplace and external conference support services, high-level meeting participation, strategy solution and involvement in London and Lincoln and daily Media Management. These services were offered at ₤ 200 a day plus VAT. In January 2020, McCartney claimed for ₤ 7,200 towards them. IPSA handbook on costs states that MPs should act with “probity” and advocates state they need to do more to ensure they do not reward donors at taxpayers expense.James Roberts, political director of the TaxPayers Alliance, informed Insider: “MPs need to not be paying for expert services from firms that have made political contributions to their election projects.” Karl McCartney and Nigel Szembel did not react to requests for comment.Have you come throughout similar spending by other Members of Parliament?

Steve Goodrich, head of research and investigations at Transparency International UK, stated: “It is incumbent on all Members of Parliament to maintain the greatest requirements of probity, especially when it pertains to the management of taxpayers funds. Parliamentarians must scrupulously avoid the understanding, or reality, that they are seeking to reward their donors via the general public purse.” Karl McCartney and Nigel Szembel did not react to requests for comment.Have you come throughout comparable costs by other Members of Parliament? Please contact the reporter of this story at hdyer@insider.com..

— Karl McCartney (@karlmccartney) June 13, 2020No rules exist explicitly prohibiting MPs from handing agreements to run their Parliamentary offices to business run by people who provide political donations and there is no tip of misbehavior by McCartney or Szembel. IPSA handbook on costs states that MPs must act with “probity” and advocates state they must do more to ensure they do not reward donors at taxpayers expense.James Roberts, political director of the TaxPayers Alliance, informed Insider: “MPs need to not be paying for professional services from firms that have made political contributions to their election campaigns.” Susan Hawley, executive director of Spotlight on Corruption, informed Insider: “This looks potentially quite unsavoury. MPs must never be administering contracts to, or using services at public expenditure, of those who have contributed personally to their projects.”

Tags: